Rich Freeman on 30 Jan 2015 14:03:18 -0800 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] Article on 'cyberwarfare' |
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Keith C. Perry <kperry@daotechnologies.com> wrote: > > The internet would be as useful as a wet napkin if only a select number of people could host. The fact that anyone can host their own site I see as a strength not a weakness. Agree. It isn't necessary from a security standpoint to regulate who can host, though it seems likely that this is exactly the solution most likely to be pushed for economic/political reasons. I think that from a security standpoint it is just as effective to regulate WHERE you can host. Again, going back to the physical world analogy: Anybody in the world can send anybody in the US a package. If that package doesn't cross the border, there tends to be fairly little interference, but the US government has worked to ensure that you can't send a package to anybody without identifying yourself somehow. If the package does cross the border then it is subject to inspection. The result is fairly secure. > > That guy in Moscow just needs to end up on enough FW policies. Problem solved. If anything we need a better way to > report and aggregate activity- not just an email blacklist but a blacklist of all types of bad actors and their traffic. I suspect > that might even already exist. That seems a bit analogous to getting rid of the police and just reporting crimes and relying on everybody to just keep track of who all the criminals are so as to not get too involved with them. If you know some guy in Moscow sends out malware, then just arrest him. If the local government doesn't cooperate, then just exclude them from the "Internet." The result will of course be several "internets" with only limited connectivity between them. That's exactly how these kinds of problems get solved in any other area of commerce. Why should we treat data packets as being any different? But, I agree that this is unlikely to happen. It seems like the more likely solution is to just turn the internet into a big cable TV system. That would certainly make the lobbyists happier, and the voters will probably go along with it once a few dozen more Sony-style hacks occur. -- Rich ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug