Paul Walker on 18 Dec 2016 13:29:36 -0800
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] Wanted: volunteers with bandwidth, storage, coding skills to help save climate data
|
- From: Paul Walker <pjwalker76@gmail.com>
- To: "Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List" <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Subject: Re: [PLUG] Wanted: volunteers with bandwidth, storage, coding skills to help save climate data
- Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 16:29:28 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=o7xpW6yxykL7ijSXTLqcCsHubXEGyzQ6seGVTQlc5f4=; b=jGaoq+zG/bI4TI7PuSFvxnflrDqyjDdQPZ/htaWqzxTAFksTb3Ulhx1R0ROEDT/WKn alSSQixFB2ENoCAaRidM/U62YB7rObTmJaoC/2ojgpWbMh5ACr3/nR1EtC5ir0/bXTcK K4IX7sRwi1Y0viDi2ySxto6a4BVtaTKglldpsh1676zumTIeSCpzaiY6zUvp8q+H3YZa IQjyvCr1FNuR5BV5s/5yzSD5PUtKHIByA80/ZtZoUI2M4Edksk0l+RXzOBHbzgAgsvPR 8bopFhOum3OqzcNYKty3TfkaPQ5OcIScinLiZUxcbLplXHxIY5SyGEX70gC+dxkG3cjO 1w/g==
- Reply-to: Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Sender: "plug" <plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org>
Can we steer the conversation back to the topic at hand? I am curious about the possibility of large amounts of "controversial" data being sequestered or destroyed. Certainly the liquidation of entire classes of data (and of human technical talent) has been undertaken before in the name of political expediency. I'm thinking of Argentina, Iran, etc. I'm curious given the particular skill-set of our group what people's opinions are regarding the plausibility of such a thing happening -- politically yes, but also technically. Are these large data sets vulnerable? Assuming there is a massive interest in skewing the conversation about climate change, does it not seem at least plausible that someone would undertake to modify, corrupt or delete the underlying data, whether they were state actors, unaligned and anonymous hackers, corporate interests or others? Doesn't it make sense to have the strongest data redundancy possible in place for irreplaceable data that has been gathered over decades by scientists, satellites, the noaa, etc. Is it paranoid to think that this body of knowledge is extremely valuable and potentially vulnerable? Are there technical solutions that our community could be a part of to help ensure that these collective resources are not endangered by sharp political swings or other unforseen circumstances?
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
- References:
- [PLUG] Wanted: volunteers with bandwidth, storage, coding skills to help save climate data
- From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
- Re: [PLUG] Wanted: volunteers with bandwidth, storage, coding skills to help save climate data
- From: "Eric H. Johnson" <ejohnson@camalytics.com>
- Re: [PLUG] Wanted: volunteers with bandwidth, storage, coding skills to help save climate data
- From: Rich Freeman <r-plug@thefreemanclan.net>
- Re: [PLUG] Wanted: volunteers with bandwidth, storage, coding skills to help save climate data
- From: LeRoy <ldc@lrcressy.com>
- Re: [PLUG] Wanted: volunteers with bandwidth, storage, coding skills to help save climate data
- From: "Eric H. Johnson" <ejohnson@camalytics.com>
- Re: [PLUG] Wanted: volunteers with bandwidth, storage, coding skills to help save climate data
- From: Alex Ruijie Fang <frjalex@temple.edu>
- Re: [PLUG] Wanted: volunteers with bandwidth, storage, coding skills to help save climate data
- From: Rich Freeman <r-plug@thefreemanclan.net>