|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: next talk after Clojure?
|
- From: "Jonathan Tran" <jonnytran@gmail.com>
- To: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
- Subject: Re: next talk after Clojure?
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:17:24 -0500
- Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jonnytran@gmail.com designates 64.233.178.248 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jonnytran@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-sender:x-apparently-to :received:received:received-spf:authentication-results:received :dkim-signature:domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id :date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:reply-to :sender:precedence:x-google-loop:mailing-list:list-id:list-post :list-help:list-unsubscribe:x-beenthere-env:x-beenthere; bh=3Hz5B+/Qcwf35PMkHZ4m+DTStGXA+TWseP6wLbJCOY8=; b=igxfROwar86jt5oXTlphJE1Cq8gdAI/JG5MDPG+1i86oVhszvYZ8KtRm8C2GHEa71B D1s9QsqhC+Y/k3/oXFo5BnTiiyXrXc3yLznOu0M3lET1g3a4Ha2Is6Tx1I86JcIDlVr3 cpLoOScjUG2ENKNzqwt+C+tEKQIsImR48kjow=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=iKon0JCDqBKF/VL5VAXOFg2G3k12NLhTGJ5RcxLL+Ns=; b=v1fHWhLKTX6nxvFeuSLtRaqFyDt4HXDcdUeFxZsb6ExbRBCEPfzPqVwyuYYj5GkO0+ pnX2/M5hbi56g+qEtdKmJDvp9YvBOuZT6lTf0A1g6L8OL3d/Q022nxnEECI+ReqLM8qp XGVwx7OAjTO3bQxi65y1f4XzI2QqeCnc8ix6o=
- Mailing-list: list philly-lambda@googlegroups.com; contact philly-lambda+owner@googlegroups.com
- Reply-to: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
- Sender: philly-lambda@googlegroups.com
> I want
> to hear about how they did lisp "in the large".
I'd like to hear about that also.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Scott Fraser <Scott.E.Fraser@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have one potential future speaker in mind I would like to suggest,
> but unfortunately he is tied up in law school right now. He worked in
> a "large" lisp shop - team based lisp programming on a large scale!
> Government related stuff. I asked him today if he would be interested
> in speaking, and he said yes but it might be quite a while (like 2010)
> before he has time. Paul Graham and other old-skool Lisp grey-beards
> apparently worked at this same shop.
>
> I'll keep bugging him. maybe we could bribe him with something. I want
> to hear about how they did lisp "in the large".
>
> -Scott
>
> On Nov 13, 11:30 am, Bonnie Aumann <auma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Just wanted to say that it was great meeting y'all at the Clojure
>> talk. I followed most of the talk (well done Mike!), but I got more
>> out of hanging out afterwards. Thanks for letting a project management
>> type crash the talk - I hope to join you again.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Bonnie
>>
>> On Nov 10, 2:59 pm, "Kyle R. Burton" <kyle.bur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I know its a .NET language, but readinghttp://spotless-spots.blogspot.com/2008/11/why-i-like-f.htmlhasgot
>> > me interested in seeing F# in action by an experienced .NET developer.
>>
>> > Does anyone have enough experience to give a talk and demonstration on
>> > F#? Or know someone from outside the group we could invite to do it?
>>
>> > Are others in the group interested in F# enough to have it be a Philly
>> > Lambda talk?
>>
>> > Kyle
>>
>>
|
|