in the Rails community... on the one hand the Rails core team wants to
supporting simple small-scale Rails apps can be a pain. There really
are both too expensive and technical for many people.
I think a lot of people hold fastCGI against Rails. What is the
better solution? I have been using mongrel for about a week. For
development it is noticably more speedy than ./script/server. I am
interested in using mongrel for deployment on a big app with a
dedicated server, but what choice do I have if I deploy to just about
anything other than a dedicated server? It's especially bothersome
for menial applications like typo (I mean that in the most
affectionate way). FastCGI is even worse on shared hosting setups,
even the ones that support it (mine at least).
Of course none of this is RoR's fault, but fCGI does hurt its street
cred a bit.
--flinn
On Jul 26, 2006, at 11:39 AM, Aaron Blohowiak wrote:
> He holds the flakinees of fastCGI against rails, which is a stupid
> thing to do. He also thinks that the people most benifiting from
> rails are the publishers. and here i thought it was the teams of
> small people doing big things...
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list