Dave Turner on Sat, 11 Aug 2001 16:42:51 -0400 |
gabriel rosenkoetter wrote: > > [In the future, it would be nice for those of us using a mail reader > that pays attention to threading if, when replying on an unrelated > topic, PLUG posters removed the In-Reply-To: header if they were not > actually going to reply to the content of a message. I've munged > the headers a bit to get this to show up as a new thread here on > out.] No, the References header. In-Reply-To is completely informal and almost useless. References is formal: a list of message-ids. -- -Dave Turner --------------------------------------------------------------------- "It's like filing a suit for your own wrongful death because somebody coughed next to you and they might have had TB--first of all, you ain't dead, second of all, they didn't have it!" - Effugas ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|