Bill Jonas on Tue, 5 Mar 2002 00:07:44 -0500 |
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 09:49:21PM -0500, Darxus@chaosreigns.com wrote: > I suggest putty (GPLed windows ssh client, google.com search for it). <pendantic> Actually, no, it's not GPL'd. It's what RMS would describe as a "simple, permissive, non-copyleft free software license", one step shy of public domain, actually. Much more like an MIT/X/BSD (modified) license than GPL; statement of copyright, disclaimer of warranty, permission to use, modify, and redistribute, and not much else. The PuTTY license is at <http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/licence.html>. </pendantic> I've seen at least one gratis binary-only application based on PuTTY, WinSCP. I haven't used it myself, but it seems like it puts an FTP-client-like frontend on scp. It's at <http://winscp.vse.cz/>, and the license (<http://winscp.vse.cz/eng/licence.php>) definitely doesn't give you the same freedoms as the PuTTY license. -- Bill Jonas * bill@billjonas.com * http://www.billjonas.com/ Developer/SysAdmin for hire! See http://www.billjonas.com/resume.html Attachment:
pgpei91ZxjP2i.pgp
|
|