Darxus on Tue, 5 Mar 2002 12:35:53 -0500 |
On 03/05, Bill Jonas wrote: > Actually, no, it's not GPL'd. It's what RMS would describe as a My bad, I could have sworn putty used to be GPLed. On 03/05, Greg Lopp wrote: > It's not just the data files that would have to be put in the > jail is it? Wouldn't you also need all of the various libraries Yup. Yes, it would be involved. It's another one of those my convenience vs. an attackers convenience issues. I don't think library dependancies are hard - you just chroot it and try to run it and copy over the libs it complains about not having. I guess for most people it wouldn't be worth it, but if you're bored, it might be an entertaining and educational way to spend a weekend :) -- Do you believe your government could be vastly improved ? Vote. Don't waste it on a Republican or a Democrat. http://www.ChaosReigns.com ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|