Bill Jonas on Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:08:33 -0400


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Mutt & Pine & GnuPG & Mental Health (Re: Urban EW (was RE: Ricochet and various wireless (was: Re: [PLUG] key-signing Thursday?))) 

On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 05:46:00PM -0400, Darxus@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> Not insecure, just not standards compliant.

Yes, I believe it was meant in the context of "my Pine users won't be
able to benefit from the added security", as opposed to "KMail is
insecure".

-- 
Bill Jonas    *    bill@billjonas.com    *    http://www.billjonas.com/
"They that can give up  essential  liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."        -- Benjamin Franklin

Attachment: pgpNn8UKQjBqo.pgp
Description: PGP signature