Noah silva on Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:12:04 -0400 |
I create and edit documents on OOo and SO and save them to .doc and distribute them at work. So far nobody has been able to tell the difference. (This includes taking .doc files, editing them, and saving them back to .doc). Mind you, none of these are super-complicated, but many of them have tables, etc. My girlfriend used SO for a time to compose docs, save them as .doc, and take them into school to print out. This resulted in formatting problems because: a.) Different printers used at home and school. b.) Different fonts. -- noah silva On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Bill Jonas wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 08:21:19AM -0400, Arthur S. Alexion wrote: > > How is it with Word doc compatibility. I need to be able to open a doc > > in either word processor and edit it without screwing it up for the > > other. Being able to open and read a doc is not enough. That seemed > > to be SO's strength. > > Ah. I haven't tried that; the Word docs that I've needed to look at > have been the sort that didn't need to be Word docs (nothing special > that required any type of special formatting) and didn't need to be > edited and returned. > > > Have you tried it? Your opinion? > > I haven't tried it myself, no. Sorry. > > -- > Bill Jonas * bill@billjonas.com * http://www.billjonas.com/ > "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary > safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin > ______________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group - http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements-http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mail/listinfo/plug
|
|