Bill Jonas on Mon, 26 Aug 2002 17:10:10 +0200 |
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 09:21:57AM -0400, Michael Leone wrote: > What was 2.0, anyway? 2.1 was "slink"; 2.2 was "potato"; 3.0 is "woody". Debian-1.1 -> buzz Debian-1.2 -> rex Debian-1.3.1 -> bo Debian-2.0 -> hamm Debian-2.1 -> slink You can see these symlinks at <ftp://archive.debian.org/debian-archive/dists/> or at the same path on ftp.debian.org. ;-) AFAIK, that's the complete lists. There was no 1.0 since a CD distributer jumped the gun on labeling one of their CDs as "Debian 1.0", so they skipped 1.0 to avoid confusion. Not sure what the story is on rex <-> bo, as there's 1.3.1 but no 1.3. -- Bill Jonas * bill@billjonas.com * http://www.billjonas.com/ "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin Attachment:
pgpVNXt8ykhHE.pgp
|
|