Paul on Fri, 4 Oct 2002 10:00:04 -0400


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PLUG - The Happy Fun List! - [Was: Re: [PLUG] KDE 3.0...is slow]




If it has some HTML elements that aren't critical or that can be
represented as plain text, I send as both plain text and HTML which
gives the reader a choice.



First: what about a textual communication could possibly require HTML?

Second: please don't do that here. That significantly more than
doubles the size of your message and wastes everyone's bandwidth. If
it's presentable as plain text, send it that way. If it's
unpresentable as plain text, put it on a web page and send us a URL.


Some forms of text formating require HTML. But, fair enough. When Mozilla asks how I want to send a message to PLUG I'll tell it to send in plain text. So I stand by my recommendation to config the composer to prompt for a formatting decision before sending. Forcing *all* e-mail to send as plain text is too limiting.



_________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug