gabriel rosenkoetter on Wed, 13 Nov 2002 13:40:06 -0500 |
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 10:21:14AM -0700, W. Chris Shank wrote: > I think it would appeal to any technical person who would like to see an > in In-Place migration from Windows-to-Linux be possible. While this is attractive for that reason, it's horrendously complicated. First, NTFS keeps files in a drastically different way than ext3 (or say that sentence the other way around, it really doesn't matter; neither is particularly "standard"). It's probably simply impossible to convert one to the other without using some amount of scratch space. Second, I don't know that NTFS is even *documented* unless you sign an NDA with MS. Which means no GPL'ing the software you produce. (Same's true for reverse-engineering, if you take EULAs as legal... and it doesn't really matter whether *you* think they should be legal, it matters whether MS will sue you. And if you start distributing something for in-place Windows->Linux conversion, they will.) -- gabriel rosenkoetter gr@eclipsed.net Attachment:
pgpCwngG63YE5.pgp
|
|