Fred K Ollinger on Tue, 28 Jan 2003 18:41:03 -0500 |
> After a few days of struggling along using Redmond's finest desktop OS, > I realize I'm using my personal laptop (Apple Powerbook G4) way too > much. Dagnabbit, I need a *NIX box on my desk. > > While I usually use OpenBSD or OS X for personal stuff, this is work, > and I don't have time to screw around. So I grab Red Hat's latest > stable distro (8.0), pop it in the chintzy little CD tray trying not to > break the 'puter and reboot. > > Red Hat installs fine, no complaints, and even seems to recognize my > video card and monitor. Did you do a text install? > XFree86 doesn't work. Unless you did a text install, how did you install it? > OK I know Dell somewhat recently got out of the Linux business, but boy > oh boy I didn't know they were going to go out of their way to use > stuff that doesn't work with Linux (actually, I'm lying... I used to > support their laptops so I know what kind of compatibility pains can > come with Dells). Turns out that the video chipset they are using > won't be supported until XFree86 4.3.0. Although I don't like rh's business practices, I don't think that this is correct. This is an XFree related question, which as you realize transcends mere distro anomolies. Are you sure you have the model right? I am typing on that model right now from rh7.2. I can give you a copy of my XFree86-4 file. I can't help you w/ anything other than rh7.2, however, b/c that's all I have experience w/. > Right now I'm compiling binary RPM's from the SRPM's from Rawhide > (XFree86-4.2.99) and crossing my fingers (and maybe saluting this Dell > with a finger). Every time I touch a piece of Dell hardware I am > reminded way I dislike their hardware and why, given an opportunity to > do so, I'd never sign a purchase order for Dell hardware. Ha, funny what money makes us do. I'd not only support windows, I'd support a Vic-20 if that's what paid the bills. But I'm lucky enough to deal primarily in linux. > If it sounds like I'm overreacting, you might be right if it were just > one isolated incident. But I've never had to deal with a single > manufacturer pumping out more *BAD STUFF* over such a long period of > time except perhaps Packard Bell. I can tell you compaq horror stories, but Packard Bell hardware was just silly. :) Fred _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|