Mike Leone on 19 Aug 2005 03:14:55 -0000 |
Tom Diehl wrote: > On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Mike Leone wrote: > >> Tom Diehl wrote: >> >>> >>> Why not simplify your setup and use NFS. It is much easier to manage NFS >>> for *nix to *nix applications than it is to involve samba. >> >> Not if you want the wife's Windows laptop to also be able to (easily) >> access the shared files as well. :-) > > Agreed but the OP said nothing about needing windoze access. He doesn't (today). But Samba is a much easier, cross-platform solution. No extra NFS client needed for future Windows or Apple stations, for a start. And less file-sharing daemons to run on the server, if you choose one sharing method, and stay with it. -- We're all basically primeval slime with ideas above its station. - Dr. Who ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|