| Art Alexion on 13 Dec 2005 12:41:58 -0000 |
|
Michael C. Toren wrote: >On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 09:33:04PM -0500, Mark M. Hoffman wrote: > > >>>Please don't strip the lm-sensors list from the CC's. >>> >>> >>Whoops, like I just did... because I didn't notice the Reply-To munging. Ick! >> >>http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html >> >> > >This is raised about every other year or so, but for the immediate future >I'm still inclined to keep the reply-to. > > > I support Michael's position on this. Not every MUA has a "reply to list" command, and too often, people inadvertently reply to the poster of the last message only, taking a discussion that may be of interest to others, essentially private, contrary to the purpose of holding discussions on lists. In those relatively rare instances where multiple replies, or off-list replies, are appropriate, manual changes can be made by the sender. -- _______________________________________ Art Alexion Arthur S. Alexion LLC PGP fingerprint: 52A4 B10C AA73 096F A661 92D2 3B65 8EAC ACC5 BA7A The attachment -- signature.asc -- is my electronic signature; no need for alarm. Info @ http://mysite.verizon.net/art.alexion/encryption/signature.asc.what.html Key for signed PDFs available at http://mysite.verizon.net/art.alexion/encryption/ArthurSAlexion.p7c The validation string is TTJY-ZILJ-BJJG. ________________________________________ Attachment:
signature.asc ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|