|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: Top posting and quoting (was Re: [PLUG] Hauppauge PVR-500 capture...)
|
- From: "Chuckk Hubbard" <badmuthahubbard@gmail.com>
- To: "Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List" <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Subject: Re: Top posting and quoting (was Re: [PLUG] Hauppauge PVR-500 capture...)
- Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 02:12:47 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=4vMtc1dBnZx+RiiVq9M7tnHcMFWSSd+0BRuunsj7gWg=; b=UaAtAX94iGgtyqK3LvASfLBj2o+xHpWfNVDhLxxMlUMmkCeeZ5gsRvhws2tuAb9BJDS+jfTh4kQNLL2HeQ/yefzqsiMOF7+8DLPz781tpE6eISSUJrF6+8tExv1LbASVEUGj+/v5LrgrCPPRh9HNc8aBTp9a0IwPIM6LDgIcV4U=
- Reply-to: Philadelphia Linux User's Group Discussion List <plug@lists.phillylinux.org>
- Sender: plug-bounces@lists.phillylinux.org
On the other hand, I have been told by a blind list user that it is far simpler for him to read top posts, rather than listening to the computer say all the things he previously typed before giving him the response. You think your way is more concise AND proven superior, but not everyone shares your preferences.
-Chuckk
On 11/3/07, Eugene Smiley <eug+plug@esmiley.net> wrote:
But notice how concise it IS if you edit the message to ONLY quote what you are
replying to? Sure I could top post this and it wouldn't be hard to read, but the
worthless untrimmed cruft that doesn't forward the topic has already gone
through hundreds of servers. Don't send it again...
My way of saying I agree AND proving it.
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|