Eric on 13 Dec 2007 17:05:53 -0000 |
Art Alexion wrote: > On Wednesday 12 December 2007 14:41:24 Chad Waters wrote: >> I've been subscribed to this list for well over 4 years and most of >> the time I've found it extremely valuable. I've been ignoring this >> list recently due to the increase of noise. Over the past few months >> we've seen threads about: >> >> ... the appropriateness of mount command innuendo. >> ... automatic vs manual transmissions. >> ... political affiliations. >> ... top posting vs bottom posting. >> ... flaming of obviously legitimate job postings > > Chad's list ignores the elephant in the livingroom — off-topic threads about > off-topic posts. I have no intention of counting and measuring, but my hunch > is that the biggest bandwidth wasters of late are threads like these where > people bitch and counter-bitch about off-topic posts. The angst > over "post-appropriateness" seems to take (waste?) far more time than the > off-topic threads themselves. > > I vote for Steve Gran's suggestion that serial offenders be addressed > off-list. This discussion just prompted a thought: What about another PLUG list for OT discussions? That way, the existing list would be the "Signal" list and the new list would be the "Noise" list. PLUG-TALK? PLUG-NOISE? BTW I'd consider job postings as "Signal" Eric -- # Eric Lucas # # "Oh, I have slipped the surly bond of earth # And danced the skies on laughter-silvered wings... # -- John Gillespie Magee Jr ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|