Michael Leone on 18 Jan 2009 08:32:13 -0800 |
Walt Mankowski wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 09:48:45PM -0500, Brian Vagnoni wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Walt Mankowski >>> Rather than jumping through a bunch of legal and technological hoops, >>> might it not be simpler to ask the person on the other end of the line >>> for written confirmation of whatever you've discussed before agreeing >>> to it? Other options I can think of off the top of my head are a) >>> physically go to the bank (assuming it's local) and talk to someone in >>> person, or b) go Luddite on them and conduct all transactions with >>> them via US Mail. >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> Walt while I welcome your comments; telling me this is like me >> responding to a programing question of yours with "you should use a >> calculator instead". > > They seem like perfectly reasonable suggestions to me. If you want to > use a programming analogy, asking for written confirmation is like > using tee(1) to save data to a file so you still have a copy when it > scrolls off the screen. It's a perfectly reasonably thing to ask any > customer service rep for on the phone. While it might be reasonable, I've never heard of any customer rep who has provided written transcripts of a call. Perhaps no one has ever asked. I've gotten written confirmation from financial institutions for certain types of transactions - payments received, account information changed, etc. But not transcripts or confirmations before changes to accounts. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|