Re: [PLUG] Mac OS X Ext2 Filesystem

[gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@eclipsed.net>]

At 2009-04-20 18:05 -0400, Art Alexion <art.alexion@gmail.com> wrote:
> Any better suggestions?

FAT32 is the only safe choice. (Nobody's NTFS support besides
Microsoft's can "safely" be used for RW access: everything else is
experimental for write access. That's because of Microsoft's refusal
to release documentation of their file system.)

At 2009-04-20 23:15 +0100, Stephen Gran <steve@lobefin.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 06:05:00PM -0400, Art Alexion said:
> > Any better suggestions?
> HFS+ ?

Plausible, but also experimental. There's a tad greater reason to
imagine that the RW modes won't break things because Apple provides
better documentation of the format, but most of what's out there is
looking pretty stale:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/linux-hfsplus
http://www.ardistech.com/hfsplus/

-- 
gabriel rosenkoetter
gr@eclipsed.net

Attachment: pgpHHe5zMUvyp.pgp
Description: PGP signature

___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug