brent timothy saner on 1 Sep 2009 22:27:52 -0700 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 zuzu wrote: > I've been an advocate of the freenetworks.org mentality since the > early adoption of 802.11b circa 2001. real-life "Wi-Fi" transfer > rates are far below my 20Mbps symmetric (soon to be upgraded to > 25Mbps) uplink to FiOS, so why bother trying to "secure" it? (IMO, > you're just being a dick by locking out free riders.) anything > important like email should be encrypted with SSL connections from the > client computer anyway. not to mention all the embedded devices with > "Wi-Fi" connectivity that don't understand or play nice with anything > except an open AP. > > what i do is i run a LAN and have two networks (can do this quite easily on one router with openWRT); a wpa2 (and sometimes freeRADIUS, if i feel the context needs it) protected network and an open network (both labeled appropriately). the open network is a sort of outgoing DMZ; it has no routes to the LAN and is firewalled appropriately. so yes, virginia; one CAN have the best of BOTH worlds. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkqeAk8ACgkQ8u2Zh4MtlQpcPQCg2ozK08Mx2GQt98YGbvUVNqmJ ZoMAoOnCIjme3iSLXlIpexMqV2rZhqvJ =g9fX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|