Richard Freeman on 8 Nov 2010 14:17:28 -0800 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] Linux Today Posting: Google Sues The US Government For Only Considering Microsoft Solutions |
On 11/08/2010 01:17 PM, Sean M. Collins wrote: > On 11/8/10 10:52 AM, Richard Freeman wrote: > No, it's certainly open source. I think what you mean to say, is that > it's not as easy to port and build as most FOSS software is. Yup - that's what I meant. It doesn't FEEL like open source - it doesn't have that nice comforting feeling that I usually get from it. While not OSI-approved, the license basically seems to be in the spirit of open source. >> I'd probably consider it as a competitor to the >> likes of gmail/outlook (it is, after all, more open then those), but not >> really to something like Thunderbird/Courier/etc. > > No, because Thunderbird is just an MUA and Courier is an IMAP/POP > server. Zimbra is a groupware system. Calendaring, MTA, MUA, contact > management, etc... Again, I was thinking more in terms of the cleanness of it as a distro / piece of software. I wouldn't consider it a competitor to Thunderbird+apache+clamav+squirrelmail+courier+postfix either, but I would consider it a competitor to Outlook+IIS+McAfee+OutlookWebAccess+Exchange. It isn't about features - it is about being clean, open, and generally doing things the Unix way. Compared to the former it seems better-integrated, but less open. Compared to the latter it clearly is much more open. >> I doubt I'd ever use >> it to manage my email at home... > > Good god, no. Not for one person. That's way overboard. > Hey, that hasn't stopped me from using thunderbird + apache + clamav + squirrelmail + procmail + postgrey + dspam + courier-imap + postfix. It hasn't stopped me from running a samba domain with roaming profiles either. One of these days I might get my one phone line running through asterisk as well. At home, I don't really need the calendaring though. Once you get rid of the calendaring requirement there are actually a bunch of options. What I'm running is a fairly straightforward approach to that - IMAP+SMTP makes everything easy. Rich ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug