|john boris on 24 Aug 2016 09:03:36 -0700|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|Re: [PLUG] epiphany or stupidity?|
The concept is called deduplication; lots of backup programs support
it. My DataDomains get over 90% space savings that way.
As for SANs, that's also how our new Dell XtremIO SAN can use 20TB to
take over for our older VNX with 80TB (they tell me; we haven't
finished installing it yet, much less migrated).
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Tone Montone <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I was running last night, and for some reason, I had an idea about backups.
> It occurred to me that if I had 100 Red Hat systems, all running the same OS
> and Patch level, would I need full backups on all the systems. Wouldn't
> there be static information like executables that would be the same across
> all systems? So instead of doing fulls x 100, I could do a full x 1, then
> just differentials or incrementals on the others, thereby reducing total
> storage required on tapes.
> Then I thought if I took the same idea and applied it to the SAN storage,
> could I have fixed images that the systems run on, and only require 1
> instance of it, thereby reducing total storage space requirements.
> Then I thought, either this is a really stupid idea, or it's brilliant and
> most likely already done.
> Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
> Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/
> General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/