John Kreno on 20 Dec 2017 08:55:28 -0800 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PLUG] New Comcast wireless modem with old Buffalo wireless router |
I'm not sure about "NATed in the opposite direction"The Actiontec was just another client on the LAN.The TV box could access the Verizon resources itneeded via it's cable connection through the Actiontec.There were no connections to the Actiontec LAN ports.EricOn Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Rich Freeman <r-plug@thefreemanclan.net> wrote:On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Eric Lucas <eric@lucii.org> wrote:
>
> My solution was to connect the Actiontec WAN input to the LAN
> (wireless turned off, as always) and configured to get an IP via DHCP.
> Since the cable connection was still attached, the cable box could
> network to Verizon's servers and the guide information re-appeared.
>
Clever - basically just running the router in reverse. Did you
basically have it NATed in the opposite direction?
--
Rich
____________________________________________________________ _______________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
____________________________________________________________ _______________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug