Michael C. Toren on Sun, 29 Jun 2003 16:05:23 -0400 |
> >Are you able to successfully traceroute to either 127.0.0.1 or > >62.234.101.241 if you specify the device to use by hand? > > No. That is, the attaching works fine, but the actual traceroute fails. > (Just a bunch of *s). > > >Another test to help determine if it's a libpcap problem might be to > >see if tcpdump can attach to the loopback interface. Something like: > > > > tcpdump -n -i lo0 > > This is a very useless command on Solaris. First off, Solaris comes with > snoop, so tcpdump is not often installed. Secondly, packets sent over > the loopback interface on Solaris do not travel high enough down and up > the IP stack to be able to be sniffed. This is a major drawback when > troubleshooting local connections: anything sent over lo0 cannot be seen > by snoop or pcap. [..] > Looks like this will never work on Solaris. Yes, I think you're right. Oh, well. At least tracing to remote systems now works under Solaris as of 1.3, even if tracing to the localhost fails. I just modified the testsuite script so that it now attempts every test, instead of the old behavior of bailing out the first time a test fails. When you have a moment, can you please download a new copy and mail me it's output on your Solaris system? <http://michael.toren.net/code/tcptraceroute/compatibility/tcptra-testsuite.pl> Thanks! -mct _______________________________________________ tcptraceroute-dev mailing list tcptraceroute-dev@netisland.net https://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/tcptraceroute-dev
|
|