Paul on Mon, 9 Jun 2003 08:08:10 -0400 |
Forge wrote: Doesn't a dual CPU system require twice the amount of RAM? Really? So two CPUs share the same RAM? If both are working under the same load, will they split their memory use in half? In other words, if you have 512MB of RAM, will each CPU only have 256MB to work with? (Not that that isn't a good amount of RAM.) The single 2GHz system would have better hardware features such as AGP 4 or 8x, higher memory speed and capacity, USB 2.0, the ability to go beyond 2GHz, etc.. The PC in question is a PII, not a PIII. There should be a noticable difference between a PII and the P4 or Athlon in question. Greater memory speeds and higher max memory would probably help more than anything else, for sound editing, that's true, but USB2 again falls into the 'does nothing' category, as USB2 peripherals are very few and far between, and USB devices have typically lagged a bit on Linux support. USB2 isn't exactly useless, but it's not really anything I see anyone making hardware picks around, either, especially when USB2 PCI cards can be had for ~20$. That's one of my implied points. Unless you want to spend a lot of cash, the single CPU system is the way to go. Plus you don't need to think about SMP software issues. Sorry to jump all over what you said, but I'm a big time hardware guru, and I just couldn't let it slide. That's fine. Consider this hardware feature: Built-in ATA133 drive contollers, maybe with RAID. Drive speed always being a bottleneck, the faster drives and striping could make the system more responsive. Again, you could add a card for that, but that increases complexity and reduces slot availability.
|
|