Edward M. Corrado on Thu, 19 Jun 2003 08:49:20 -0400 |
I am about to apply some patches to a Pentium II - 266 machine running RedHat 9.0. I noticed on the RedHat Mirror that I use there are a few i686 RPM's and the rest are i386 rpms. In theory, I understand the difference. However, since RedHat seems to enjoy shipping i386 RPMs, is there any downside to using the i686 RPMs when available. The only i686 ones available from the mirror are for the kernel, glibc, nptl-devel (which I don't need) and openssl. Basically, I'm wondering if there is any downside to going with the i686 RPMs when available. I don't know of any off the top of my head, but if I may run into potential conflicts, I'd rather forgo the i686 versions for the i386 ones. For some reason, I think I might need to be more concerned about glibc then the kernel. Ed C. _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|