Eugene Smiley on 30 Aug 2005 13:52:43 -0000 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 gyoza@comcast.net wrote: > William H. Magill wrote: > > >>The implication from their whitelist questionnaire implies that >>they are now employing SPF -- Sender Policy Framework -- http:// >>spf.pobox.com/ -- which appears to be a proprietary, or otherwise >>not widely adopted new protocol. >> > > Yeah, it just isn't widely adopted. It isn't a evil, secret empire > thing. And it's not proprietary, although M$ did try to co-opt it like everything else they take an interest in. William, I'm surprised that you haven't heard of it before. I thought it was discussed on list before. Maybe I'm wrong. It's in the RFC process still, but AOL and Earthlink I think both check SPF records and use the results in their Whitelists. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQxRkeekD7QKn7f0vEQLsbACg81uZALClJrPILoxEjd4jmbWFeFEAnA17 mSDbmjlP7lbqMB27CmxThBla =p4lk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|