bergman on 7 Aug 2007 16:08:00 -0000 |
In the message dated: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 11:31:44 EDT, The pithy ruminations from "Brian Stempin" on <Re: [PLUG] is there an audience for linux matrix?> were: => => I think it's usefulness would be a direct result of the user's ability to => drill down into detail. Initially, yes. The matrix could be very useful, and visually appealing. For a similar concept, see the Unix Rosetta Stone: http://bhami.com/rosetta.html However, I think there's one very important thing that's been overlooked in this discussion. The Linux Matrix will only be useful if it is continually maintained at a high level of accuracy. This would be a tremendous commitment to on-going research and site administration. Regardless of how the information is presented, what interface is used, etc., the whole concept relies on the completeness and accuracy of the data. Since the vendors of different Linux distributions don't have a standardized format (XML, csv, or even text that can be machine parsed) for describing the requirements and capabilities of their distributions, maintaining the Linux Matrix would require a huge amount of work. Imagine monitoring LWN, DistroWatch, linux.org, linuxhq.com, etc. on a daily or weekly basis in order to get timely announcements of new or updated distributions. Then you've got to go to the home page for each distribution, read their announcement and documentation in order to manually extract the data that you want to list in the matrix. That data often comes with many qualifications, which will require manual choices for how they should be listed in the matrix. For example, the hypothetical FooBar might list: RAM Requirement for FooBar distribution: embedded systems installation (ARM) 32MB embedded systems installation (x86) 64MB kiosk installation 256MB desktop installation 512MB desktop installtion (SPARC) 768MB internet server installation 512MB developer installation 1GB developer installation (Itanium) 2GB desktop + graphics installation 1.5GB database server installation 2GB Does this mean that FooBar has 10 separate entries in the Matrix? Do you list RAM requirements as being "32MB to 2GB"? Is the minimum RAM simply 32MB? Do you exclude particular flavors of the release? Overall...it sounds like a good idea, but I seriously question whether such a cross-system comparison can possibly be self sustaining, unless there's a significant on-going investment in personnel, or unless the vendors make system requirements and features available in a standardized, parseable format. Mark ----- Mark Bergman Biker, Rock Climber, Unix mechanic, IATSE #1 Stagehand http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=bergman%40merctech.com I want a newsgroup with a infinite S/N ratio! Now taking CFV on: rec.motorcycles.stagehands.pet-bird-owners.pinballers.unix-supporters 15+ So Far--Want to join? Check out: http://www.panix.com/~bergman ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|