|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [PLUG] is there an audience for linux matrix?
|
In the message dated: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 11:31:44 EDT,
The pithy ruminations from "Brian Stempin" on
<Re: [PLUG] is there an audience for linux matrix?> were:
=>
=> I think it's usefulness would be a direct result of the user's ability to
=> drill down into detail.
Initially, yes. The matrix could be very useful, and visually appealing.
For a similar concept, see the Unix Rosetta Stone:
http://bhami.com/rosetta.html
However, I think there's one very important thing that's been overlooked in
this discussion. The Linux Matrix will only be useful if it is continually
maintained at a high level of accuracy. This would be a tremendous commitment
to on-going research and site administration.
Regardless of how the information is presented, what interface is used, etc.,
the whole concept relies on the completeness and accuracy of the data. Since
the vendors of different Linux distributions don't have a standardized format
(XML, csv, or even text that can be machine parsed) for describing the
requirements and capabilities of their distributions, maintaining the Linux
Matrix would require a huge amount of work. Imagine monitoring LWN,
DistroWatch, linux.org, linuxhq.com, etc. on a daily or weekly basis in order
to get timely announcements of new or updated distributions. Then you've got to
go to the home page for each distribution, read their announcement and
documentation in order to manually extract the data that you want to list in
the matrix. That data often comes with many qualifications, which will require
manual choices for how they should be listed in the matrix. For example, the
hypothetical FooBar might list:
RAM Requirement for FooBar distribution:
embedded systems installation (ARM) 32MB
embedded systems installation (x86) 64MB
kiosk installation 256MB
desktop installation 512MB
desktop installtion (SPARC) 768MB
internet server installation 512MB
developer installation 1GB
developer installation (Itanium) 2GB
desktop + graphics installation 1.5GB
database server installation 2GB
Does this mean that FooBar has 10 separate entries in the Matrix? Do you list
RAM requirements as being "32MB to 2GB"? Is the minimum RAM simply 32MB? Do you
exclude particular flavors of the release?
Overall...it sounds like a good idea, but I seriously question whether such a
cross-system comparison can possibly be self sustaining, unless there's a
significant on-going investment in personnel, or unless the vendors make system
requirements and features available in a standardized, parseable format.
Mark
-----
Mark Bergman Biker, Rock Climber, Unix mechanic, IATSE #1 Stagehand
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=bergman%40merctech.com
I want a newsgroup with a infinite S/N ratio! Now taking CFV on:
rec.motorcycles.stagehands.pet-bird-owners.pinballers.unix-supporters
15+ So Far--Want to join? Check out: http://www.panix.com/~bergman
___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|