zuzu on 10 Oct 2007 18:10:56 -0000 |
On 10/10/07, Jason <jcostom@gmail.com> wrote: > On 10/10/07, zuzu <sean.zuzu@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Second, while 1 GB is sluggish on a 2 GHz Intel Core Duo MacBook > > > Pro, 2 GB is quite sufficient to run Firefox with 20+ tabs, > > > > try Firefox -- especially Firefox rather than Camino -- with 200+ tabs, > > Wow, put the rulers away guys.. Come on now, who really opens over > 200 pages at the same time? myself right now: [169 tabs] Gmail - [PLUG] OT: Mac OS X question > (queue the chorus of people shouting > about how this is their daily routine...) 200 tabs is most certainly > out of the ordinary. Either you're doing something tragically wrong, > or you work very differently from the vast majority of us. Either > way, you'll need to come to grips with the fact that having 200 open > tabs in any browser is not normal. I wonder how we could get empirical evidence on this. something like SLife, perhaps? http://www.slifelabs.com/ for those of you who don't rely on tabs, how do you keep track of what you're doing? iGTD (or Linux equivalent)? http://bargiel.home.pl/iGTD/ > And the longer you can afford to wait to purchase, the better - not > just true with Apple products. Any electronic product is likely to > see new & improved versions or price cuts over time. I think though the general optimization strategy is to buy very soon after an update/refresh, as that will give you the longest time before the next update/refresh. ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|