Dan Widyono on 26 Nov 2007 01:19:08 -0000 |
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 03:29:07PM -0500, Brent Saner wrote: > James- i've noticed a similar trend; my coding/developer friends tend to > use emacs whilst the sysadmin buddies i have tend to use vi. > Dan- ditto what chuckk said! i'd love to see what you like and dislike > about both; this'd be invaluable as you use both regularly. do you have a > preferred editor for certain contexts? Interesting. I code and compose e-mail with mutt/emacs and edit system configs etc. with vi. The latter because vi always works everywhere I've needed it. The former because of the automatic modes (paragraph fill especially, but I also like having a clock on the status bar :) ). I can't say vi doesn't have these features; I only use them in emacs due to familiarity. Dan W. P.S. For the stupid emacs querying about a final newline, I use this in .emacs (necessary on redhat-ish systems at least): (setq inhibit-default-init t) (setq require-final-newline nil) ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|