W. Chris Shank on 19 Jan 2008 16:48:28 -0800


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PLUG] One True OS


> There are expensive tools for doing things
> in Windows that you can do freely on Linux platforms, and you also get
> the benefit of being able to customize to your particular set of
> circumstances, instead of just the options the authors of Ghost  
> thought
> useful.

There are actually plenty of free tools as well, the best one being  
Linux itself. Linux makes a great tool to help manage Windows.


On Jan 19, 2008, at 7:34 PM, Stephen Gran wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 07:25:34PM -0500, W. Chris Shank said:
>>> But given that you are doing it, it seems in your best interest to
>>> make your own life a little easier and use an OS that is actually
>>> administerable.
>>
>> Have you actually ever administered someone else's Linux desktop
>> remotely. It's not the same as a Linux server. You need to "see"  
>> their
>> problem, just like on Windows. See how you feel after spending a half
>> day trying to get your clients new HP MFC to do network scanning in a
>> way that is even begins to approach what they were able to do with
>> Windows 98.
>
> Yes I have, and I agree, it's painful to do remote desktop support for
> any OS.  So, given that the pain is about the same ...
>
>> Desktop Linux is no easier to administer than Desktop Windows. Both
>> are fairly straightforward if you spend the time to get things setup
>> right before it hits the users desk.
>
> Here I disagree (kind of).  There are expensive tools for doing things
> in Windows that you can do freely on Linux platforms, and you also get
> the benefit of being able to customize to your particular set of
> circumstances, instead of just the options the authors of Ghost  
> thought
> useful.  I agree that Windows can be made managable with a sane set up
> policy and strictly enforced security policies, but from my  
> (admittedly,
> now slightly dated) experiences with it, it has always been harder to
> admin than any other OS I've had to work with.  The lack of debugging
> tools alone puts it at the bottom of my list of recommended choices  
> when
> considering deployments.
> -- 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> |  Stephen Gran                  | Politicians should read  
> science         |
> |  steve@lobefin.net             | fiction, not westerns and  
> detective     |
> |  http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | stories.   -- Arthur C.  
> Clarke          |
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
> Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
> General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

--
W. Chris Shank
ACE Technology Group, LLC
www.MyRemoteITDept.com
(610) 640-4223

___________________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Linux Users Group         --        http://www.phillylinux.org
Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce
General Discussion  --   http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug