Austin Murphy on 16 Oct 2006 19:10:25 -0000 |
On 10/16/06, gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@eclipsed.net> wrote: On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 10:50:30AM -0400, Austin Murphy wrote: > By standardizing the disk data format, you don't need to have crummy > BLOBs loaded into your kernel because kernel drivers can be written to > the standard. With open kernel drivers and a fast CPU, the fakeraid > setup could outperform the 3ware setup for less money. > > What's wrong with that?
My point was that a "fakeraid" setup could *possibly* outperform a "trueraid" setup for the same reasons that a software RAID setup can: If you are bottlenecking on CPU, a good main CPU can outperform a cheap embedded CPU. In the case of actually using software RAID in the Linux kernel... the data layout is controlled by the kernel, and it reallyd doesn't matter how the disk is attached as long as it's the same disk and you tell the volume manager about it. That is, using a software volume manager to provide RAID services already resolves this data layout problem.
This seems like a pretty reasonable goal... Austin ___________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.phillylinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
|
|